Hierdie bladsy word gebruik om die bladsy uitleg van jare te bespreek. Can we stick to ccffcc throughout? ---- The left aligned table doesn't work for me. Do you think we should have decades at all? How about links to other years and centuries on year pages, links to other centuries and millennia on century pages, extending the eeue page to a more far-reaching timeline page (big bang to heat death), links to other millennia and the time line on the millenmium pages? We do not need decades, except maybe in the years 1000-500 BC where they are handy, because the data (archeological e.g.) gets inprecise. A smooth transition from geological to archeological to historical timescales would be great but is not so easy to organize because the error margins also change. A general timeline page would be nice but may become pretty complicated and not easily accessible for people with different backgrounds that are used to their own way of dating We should move away from tables for layout: tables for tabled data, CSS for layout. I don not know what you mean with CSS and I also do not see what is wrong with tables. They are one of the most powerful aspects of the software as far as I can tell :[http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascading_Style_Sheets Cascading style sheets] are used for presentation, tables for content structure. I'm thinking white tables if the data has to do with the article, and colored (not meta yellow) CSS boxes to link to other prev/next articles (in ccffcc?). I find white tables rather makeshift looking, unless the content makes that different, see e.g the hieroglyph page on nl.wiki. :Okay. The color display is limited on the computer I'm editing on now, so choosing the colors are up to you — just don't use colors too close to the meta yellow). ::I put the navigation block down below again because the 'globe' on the left upper corner disrupts the alignement I don't like the "Eeue, Geskiedenis, Dae" bullets. The link to "Eeue" is already on all the century pages, "Geskiedenis" on the homepage, and "Hierdie dag in die geskiedenis" on all the day pages. Reformat, remove, keep? I don;t really see the problem with a few links more: it simply facilitates easier navigation. Most other language wiki's have the Eeue link in one form or another, even the german one that is otherwise pretty parsimonous. (Only one year on each side e.g.). I'd say keep. I've made it less prominent though. Consider the visual (CSS needs to be optimized) navigation suggestion at [http://jack.p5.org.uk/nav.html] for when af: renders the span tag and offers Kategorie:21ste eeu als:2001 ja:2001年 ko:2001년 ms:2001 simple:2001 th:พ.ศ. 2544 zh-min-nan:2001 nî

Kompare

left Kompare is a free graphical computer application which helps the user to compare two different text files or two directories. It is part of the KDE Desktop Environment and therefore primarily used on Linux and other Unix-like operating systems. Kompare does not actually compute the differences between the compared files itself, but is merely a graphical front end to the command line interface diff utility. It is a standard KDE tool, it comes packaged with the kdesdk module.

Comparing text files

As the above image shows, Kompare displays the two compared files next to each other in a way that corresponding lines are always positioned as near to each other as possible, independent of the position of the scrollbar. Lines that are different in the compared files are highlighted in both file views. Three different colors are used for highlighting, indicating whether the highlighted passage either
- exists in the first file but not in the second one (ie. the highlighted passage has been deleted from the first file); or
- exists in the second file but not in the first one (ie. it has been added to the first file); or
- exists in both files but is different (ie. it has been changed since the first file had been created)

Other features of Kompare

An incomplete list of features Kompare supports additionally to comparing text files follows.

Comparing directories

When two directories are chosen to be compared instead of two text files, Kompare displays a directory tree for both selected directories, which contains only pairs of corresponding files and directories that are not equal in the two compared directories. Clicking on an entry displays a comparison of the two selected files.

Creating and applying patches

Kompare is able to create a patch file which lists only the differences between two compared text files A and B. Further, Kompare can apply a patch file which was created this way to an original file A and, in this manner, recompute the contents of the corresponding file B. This is a comfortable utility for passing a corrected version of a file to a friend who already has an older version of the same file, because only the (relatively small) patch file has to be delivered and the receiver can generate the corrected file by applying the patch to the original file. The patches created and applied by Kompare are compatible to patch files generated or applied by the command line interface diff utility, because Kompare is in fact merely a graphical front end to diff and the patches are created and applied by patch, which gets called by Kompare.

See also

meld, KDiff3 - visualize differences very much like kompare, but on top of that allow the user to merge files (simply by picking one of a group of differing blocks of texts) and also edit details of the text. Kompare, on the other hand, is not meant for editing or merging.
- http://meld.sourceforge.net/
- http://kdiff3.sourceforge.net/

External links

- [http://www.caffeinated.me.uk/kompare/ Kompare Homepage]
- [http://www.kde-apps.org/content/show.php?content=19001 Kompare on kde-apps.org] category:KDECategory:File comparison tools

sprzet reykjavik hotels warsaw map apartment madrid online casinos